List of Available Case Notes
Consent of Charterer to Laytime commencing early
Charterparty-Asbatankvoy Terms-Clauses 5 and 6-Laytime-Notice of Readiness |
Terrebonne v. K-Sea Transportation Corporation
Terrebonne v. K-Sea Transportation Corporation, 447 F.3d 271 (5th Cir. 2007). |
Tim Jordan v. Shell Offshore Inc
:2007 US Dist. LEXIS 2192 |
Isen v. Simms
2006 SCC 41, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 349 |
New Zealand China Clays Ltd and Others v Tasman Orient Line CV
Post Casualty Conduct – Ship’s Master – Conduct – Hague Visby Rules – Article 4 |
Heilbrunn v Lightwood PLC
Description of the Case: Admiralty jurisdiction in Australia - Meaning of “a claim arising out of an |
Case name: Heilbrunn v Lightwood PLC
Description of the Case: Admiralty jurisdiction in Australia |
Otal Investments Limited, as owner of the M/V Kariba, for exoneration from or limitation of liabilit
Collision; Application of the Pennsylvania Rule; International Regulations for Preventing Collisions |
Eli Lilly Do Brazil, Ltda. v. Federal Express Corporation
Enforcement of a damage limitation clause in a waybill covering the transportation of cargo from Brazil to Japan |
UAB Garant v The Ship “Aleksandr Ksenofontov”
The plaintiff was a Lithuanian shipyard and repairer which claimed a substantial sum for repair costs incurred in respect of the defendant ship, together with interest, costs and late payment charges. |
|
C V Scheepvaartondernemning Ankergracht -v- Stemcor (A/sia) Pty Ltd & Tsuda Corporation; [2007] FCA
C V Scheepvaartondernemning Ankergracht -v- Stemcor (A/sia) Pty Ltd & Tsuda Corporation |
PNSL Berhad v Dalrymple Marine Services Pty Ltd; PNSL Berhad v The Owners of the Ship ‘Koumala’
Damage to the ship Pernas Arang (the Ship) as a result of a collision with the tug Koumala (the Tug) which was contracted to provide towage services to the Ship. |
Responsibility of shipper of combustible industrial bactericide for explosion and fire resulted in c
In re M/V DG Harmony: |
Hilditch Pty Ltd v Dorval Kaiun (No 2) [2007] FCA 2014
FCA 2014 |
Citation: [2008] FCA 551
BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd |
Supreme Court of Spain, Resolution dated 26.11.2007
Ship’s Agent held responsible for cargo damage occurring during sea carriage. |
Rail Equipment Leasing Pty Ltd v CV Scheepvaartonderneming Emmagracht
Rail Equipment Leasing Pty Ltd v CV Scheepvaartonderneming Emmagracht |
Timberwest Forest Corp. v. Pacific Link Ocean Services Corp Introduction
The plaintiff, Timberwest (“Timberwest”) sued the Defendant, a corporate carrier, Pacific Link Ocean Services Corporation (“Pacific Link”) and various individual defendants for the loss overboard of a |
Supreme Court of Spain, Resolution dated 06.06.2008 (“The Clifford Maersk”)
Ship Agent held responsible for loss of cargo |
Mazda Canada Inc. v. Mitsui O.S.K Lines Ltd. (the “Cougar Ace”)
Application for Leave to Appeal – Law and Jurisdiction Clause – Marine Liability Act – Forum Non Conveniens |
Regal Beloit Corp., et al. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd
Forum Selection Clauses in Intermodal Shipment Under a Through Bill Of Lading - Should COGSA or Carmack Apply to the Inland Shipment |
Post Casualty Conduct – Ship’s Master – Conduct – Hague Visby Rules – Article 4 (2) (a) - Cargo Vess
New Zealand China Clays Ltd and Others v Tasman Orient Line CV |
Limitation of Liability – Air Transport – Goods – Temperature at which goods were to be transported
Supreme Court of Spain, Resolution dated 18/07/2008 |
Bobby Kirk v Noble Drilling (U.S.), Inc.
U.S.D.C. – S.D. Mississippi |
Charles R. Luckey v Moncla Marine Operations, L.L.C.
U.S.D.C. - E.D. Louisiana. |
Miguel Calderon v Reederei Claus-Peter Offen GMBH & Co.
U.S.D.C. – S.D. Florida |
Nigel K. Washington v Blanchard Contractors, Inc.
U.S.D.C. – S.D. Texas – Houston Division |
Robert F. Leija v Penn Maritime, Inc.
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana (Civil Division) |
Steve Kuithe v Gulf Caribe Maritime, Inc.
U.S.D.C. - S.D. Alabama |
Victor Billiot v Cenac Towing Co.
U.S.D.C. –E.D. Louisiana. |
The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd.;
Application of Supplemental Admiralty Rule B to Electronic Fund Transfers (“EFTs”) |
Hawknet, Ltd. v. Overseas Shipping Agencies, et al.
Retroactive Effect of Ruling in Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd. with Respect to Electronic Fund Transfers |
Supreme Court of Spain, Resolution dated 06/07/2009 [Majestic K]
What amounts to delay in sea transport – Loss caused due to delay – Incorporation of Charterparty terms |
Member Login
